Loading...
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 | /* * This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public * License. See the file "COPYING" in the main directory of this archive * for more details. * * Copyright (C) 2002, 2004, 2007 by Ralf Baechle * Copyright (C) 2007 Maciej W. Rozycki */ #ifndef _ASM_WAR_H #define _ASM_WAR_H #include <war.h> /* * Work around certain R4000 CPU errata (as implemented by GCC): * * - A double-word or a variable shift may give an incorrect result * if executed immediately after starting an integer division: * "MIPS R4000PC/SC Errata, Processor Revision 2.2 and 3.0", * erratum #28 * "MIPS R4000MC Errata, Processor Revision 2.2 and 3.0", erratum * #19 * * - A double-word or a variable shift may give an incorrect result * if executed while an integer multiplication is in progress: * "MIPS R4000PC/SC Errata, Processor Revision 2.2 and 3.0", * errata #16 & #28 * * - An integer division may give an incorrect result if started in * a delay slot of a taken branch or a jump: * "MIPS R4000PC/SC Errata, Processor Revision 2.2 and 3.0", * erratum #52 */ #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_R4000_WORKAROUNDS #define R4000_WAR 1 #else #define R4000_WAR 0 #endif /* * Work around certain R4400 CPU errata (as implemented by GCC): * * - A double-word or a variable shift may give an incorrect result * if executed immediately after starting an integer division: * "MIPS R4400MC Errata, Processor Revision 1.0", erratum #10 * "MIPS R4400MC Errata, Processor Revision 2.0 & 3.0", erratum #4 */ #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_R4400_WORKAROUNDS #define R4400_WAR 1 #else #define R4400_WAR 0 #endif /* * Work around the "daddi" and "daddiu" CPU errata: * * - The `daddi' instruction fails to trap on overflow. * "MIPS R4000PC/SC Errata, Processor Revision 2.2 and 3.0", * erratum #23 * * - The `daddiu' instruction can produce an incorrect result. * "MIPS R4000PC/SC Errata, Processor Revision 2.2 and 3.0", * erratum #41 * "MIPS R4000MC Errata, Processor Revision 2.2 and 3.0", erratum * #15 * "MIPS R4400PC/SC Errata, Processor Revision 1.0", erratum #7 * "MIPS R4400MC Errata, Processor Revision 1.0", erratum #5 */ #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_DADDI_WORKAROUNDS #define DADDI_WAR 1 #else #define DADDI_WAR 0 #endif /* * Another R4600 erratum. Due to the lack of errata information the exact * technical details aren't known. I've experimentally found that disabling * interrupts during indexed I-cache flushes seems to be sufficient to deal * with the issue. */ #ifndef R4600_V1_INDEX_ICACHEOP_WAR #error Check setting of R4600_V1_INDEX_ICACHEOP_WAR for your platform #endif /* * Pleasures of the R4600 V1.x. Cite from the IDT R4600 V1.7 errata: * * 18. The CACHE instructions Hit_Writeback_Invalidate_D, Hit_Writeback_D, * Hit_Invalidate_D and Create_Dirty_Excl_D should only be * executed if there is no other dcache activity. If the dcache is * accessed for another instruction immeidately preceding when these * cache instructions are executing, it is possible that the dcache * tag match outputs used by these cache instructions will be * incorrect. These cache instructions should be preceded by at least * four instructions that are not any kind of load or store * instruction. * * This is not allowed: lw * nop * nop * nop * cache Hit_Writeback_Invalidate_D * * This is allowed: lw * nop * nop * nop * nop * cache Hit_Writeback_Invalidate_D */ #ifndef R4600_V1_HIT_CACHEOP_WAR #error Check setting of R4600_V1_HIT_CACHEOP_WAR for your platform #endif /* * Writeback and invalidate the primary cache dcache before DMA. * * R4600 v2.0 bug: "The CACHE instructions Hit_Writeback_Inv_D, * Hit_Writeback_D, Hit_Invalidate_D and Create_Dirty_Exclusive_D will only * operate correctly if the internal data cache refill buffer is empty. These * CACHE instructions should be separated from any potential data cache miss * by a load instruction to an uncached address to empty the response buffer." * (Revision 2.0 device errata from IDT available on http://www.idt.com/ * in .pdf format.) */ #ifndef R4600_V2_HIT_CACHEOP_WAR #error Check setting of R4600_V2_HIT_CACHEOP_WAR for your platform #endif /* * Workaround for the Sibyte M3 errata the text of which can be found at * * http://sibyte.broadcom.com/hw/bcm1250/docs/pass2errata.txt * * This will enable the use of a special TLB refill handler which does a * consistency check on the information in c0_badvaddr and c0_entryhi and * will just return and take the exception again if the information was * found to be inconsistent. */ #ifndef BCM1250_M3_WAR #error Check setting of BCM1250_M3_WAR for your platform #endif /* * This is a DUART workaround related to glitches around register accesses */ #ifndef SIBYTE_1956_WAR #error Check setting of SIBYTE_1956_WAR for your platform #endif /* * Fill buffers not flushed on CACHE instructions * * Hit_Invalidate_I cacheops invalidate an icache line but the refill * for that line can get stale data from the fill buffer instead of * accessing memory if the previous icache miss was also to that line. * * Workaround: generate an icache refill from a different line * * Affects: * MIPS 4K RTL revision <3.0, PRID revision <4 */ #ifndef MIPS4K_ICACHE_REFILL_WAR #error Check setting of MIPS4K_ICACHE_REFILL_WAR for your platform #endif /* * Missing implicit forced flush of evictions caused by CACHE * instruction * * Evictions caused by a CACHE instructions are not forced on to the * bus. The BIU gives higher priority to fetches than to the data from * the eviction buffer and no collision detection is performed between * fetches and pending data from the eviction buffer. * * Workaround: Execute a SYNC instruction after the cache instruction * * Affects: * MIPS 5Kc,5Kf RTL revision <2.3, PRID revision <8 * MIPS 20Kc RTL revision <4.0, PRID revision <? */ #ifndef MIPS_CACHE_SYNC_WAR #error Check setting of MIPS_CACHE_SYNC_WAR for your platform #endif /* * From TX49/H2 manual: "If the instruction (i.e. CACHE) is issued for * the line which this instruction itself exists, the following * operation is not guaranteed." * * Workaround: do two phase flushing for Index_Invalidate_I */ #ifndef TX49XX_ICACHE_INDEX_INV_WAR #error Check setting of TX49XX_ICACHE_INDEX_INV_WAR for your platform #endif /* * The RM7000 processors and the E9000 cores have a bug (though PMC-Sierra * opposes it being called that) where invalid instructions in the same * I-cache line worth of instructions being fetched may case spurious * exceptions. */ #ifndef ICACHE_REFILLS_WORKAROUND_WAR #error Check setting of ICACHE_REFILLS_WORKAROUND_WAR for your platform #endif /* * On the R10000 up to version 2.6 (not sure about 2.7) there is a bug that * may cause ll / sc and lld / scd sequences to execute non-atomically. */ #ifndef R10000_LLSC_WAR #error Check setting of R10000_LLSC_WAR for your platform #endif /* * 34K core erratum: "Problems Executing the TLBR Instruction" */ #ifndef MIPS34K_MISSED_ITLB_WAR #error Check setting of MIPS34K_MISSED_ITLB_WAR for your platform #endif #endif /* _ASM_WAR_H */ |